Argument From Religious Experience
The Argument from Religious Experience, and Why it Fails
Religious Experience Ontological Argument
Graham Oppy on religious experience vs argument & evidence
Argument from Religious Experience
9.7 Religious Experience - Argument from Miracles
The argument from religious experience | Full Story | Accha FM Podcasts
The Argument From Religious Experience
Argument from Religious Experience
Related content
- Absolute (philosophy)
- Acosmism
- Afterlife
- Agnostic existentialism
- Agnosticism
- Albrecht Ritschl
- Alister Hardy
- Alvin Plantinga
- Angels in Islam
- Animism
- Anselm of Canterbury
- Anthony Kenny
- Anti-Catholicism
- Anti-Christian sentiment
- Anti-Christianity
- Anti-cult movement
- Anti-Hinduism
- Anti-Judaism
- Anti-Protestantism
- Antireligion
- Antony Flew
- Apocalypticism
- Apologetics
- Apophatic theology
- Argument
- Argument from a proper basis
- Argument from beauty
- Argument from consciousness
- Argument from degree
- Argument from desire
- Argument from free will
- Argument from Inconsistent Revelations
- Argument from inconsistent revelations
- Argument from love
- Argument from miracles
- Argument from morality
- Argument from nonbelief
- Argument from poor design
- Argument from Reason
- Argument from reason
- Argument from religious experience
- Aristotelian view of God
- Athanasian Creed
- Atheism
- Atheist existentialism
- Atheist's Wager
- Attributes of God
- Augustine of Hippo
- Augustinian theodicy
- Averroes
- Ayyavazhi theology
- Bahá'í apologetics
- Baron d'Holbach
- Baruch Spinoza
- Bertrand Russell
- Best of all possible worlds
- Biblical canon
- Binitarianism
- Blaise Pascal
- Boethius
- Brahman
- Buddhist eschatology
- Category Anglican schools
- Category Anglican seminaries and theological colleges
- Category Anti-Gnosticism
- Category Apologetics
- Category Arguments against the existence of God
- Category Arguments for the existence of God
- Category Assemblies of God schools
- Category Bahá'í educational institutions
- Category Baptist schools
- Category Buddhist schools
- Category Buddhist universities and colleges
- Category Christian apologetics
- Category Christian apologists
- Category Christian law
- Category Christian theological movements
- Category Christian theology
- Category Conceptions of God
- Category Eastern Orthodox schools
- Category Eastern Orthodox seminaries
- Category Eschatology
- Category Feminist theology
- Category Hindu philosophical concepts
- Category Hindu schools
- Category Hindu theology
- Category Islamic schools
- Category Islamic theology
- Category Islamic universities and colleges
- Category Jewish schools
- Category Latter Day Saint schools
- Category Lutheran schools
- Category Lutheran seminaries
- Category Mennonite schools
- Category Methodist schools
- Category Methodist seminaries and theological colleges
- Category Muslim apologists
- Category Names of God
- Category New Testament theology
- Category Nondenominational Christian schools
- Category Old Testament theology
- Category Opposition to religion
- Category Philosophers of religion
- Category Philosophy of religion
- Category Presbyterian schools
- Category Quaker schools
- Category Reformed church seminaries and theological colleges
- Category Religious education
- Category Religious studies journals
- Category Roman Catholic schools
- Category Schools by religious affiliation
- Category Secondary schools affiliated with the Seventh-day Adventist Church
- Category Seminaries and theological colleges
- Category Singular God
- Category Theism
- Category Theologians
- Category Theology
- Category Theology teachers
- Category Trinitarianism
- Category Zoroastrian theology
Argument from religious experience
The Argument from religious experience is an argument for the existence of God, as against materialism.
Its logical structure is essentially as follows:
Points 2, 3 and 4 are relatively un-controversial, and the argument is formally valid, so discussion focuses on the premise (1).
The principal arguments for the premise are: Very substantial numbers of "ordinary" people report having had such experiences, though this isn't to say that religious believers aren't ordinary. Such experiences are reported in almost all known cultures.
These experiences often have very significant effects on people's lives, frequently inducing in them acts of extreme self-sacrifice well beyond what could be expected from evolutionary arguments.
These experiences often seem very real to the people involved, and are quite often reported as being shared by a number of people. Although mass delusions are not inconceivable, one needs compelling reasons for invoking this as an explanation.
Swinburne suggests that, as two basic principles of rationality, we ought to believe that things are as they seem unless and until we have evidence that they are mistaken (principle of credulity), and that those who do not have an experience of a certain type ought to believe others who say that they do in the absence of evidence of deceit or delusion (principle of testimony) and thus, although if you have a strong reason to disbelieve in the existence of God you will discount these experiences, in other cases such evidence should count towards the existence of God.
View More